Meeting Minutes:
Friday, August 27, 2004
Volume 11; Issue 31

 

Table of Contents


Committee Reports

Membership Report
(Click here to go to the Membership page)

No report.

Social Report
(Click here to go to the Social Event page)

No report.

Speaker Coordinator Report
(Click here to go to the Speaker Schedule)

Reminder:  There is no meeting next week!

  • 09/03/04     Labor Day - No Meeting
  • 09/10/04     Guest Speaker
  • 09/17/04     Ralph Cunningham
  • 09/24/04     Roger Carpenter
  • 10/01/04     Open
  • 10/08/04     Keith Miller

Treasurer Report

Just a painful reminder that the next quarter's billing goes out on 9/1/04.


Leads Report

37-13, 17-05, 42-21, 32-40, 32-17, 29-27, 12-44, 12-20, 26-13, 26-32, 05-44, 05-22, 10-32, 07-28, 45-44, 30-41, 15-26, 21-22, 21-17, 21-37, 06-41, 06-13, 06-32, 38-26, 03-04, 04-20.


Notable Mentions

Roman Okonowski gave Amy Ahrensdorf the "Thinking Outside the Box" award.  He was inspired, if only for a moment, with her speech a few weeks ago.

Paul Kavanaugh was recently on a radio talk show.  It was a business-to-business talk station where you discuss the different aspects of your business.  They said any member of MABE is welcome to do a show.  Contact Paul if you are interested.

The personal roster went around for the last time today.  You can still make changes by completing the online change form.

The board (existing and incoming members) will meet after the regular meeting to do the transition.


Question of the Day

How do you stay focused on your niche?

Gus Dekavallas - A lot of employers are struggling with benefits.  They rely on their agents to get them the best possible rates.  Unfortunately, many of these agents have relationships with the insurance providers and don't push them.  This a a niche that Gus and his company are filling.  They will make the insurance providers compete for your business.  He recently saved one company from a 20% hike in rates.  He got them down to only a 1% increase.

Jim Crossman - Everyone in here fills a niche.  You should never try to do it yourself when there are so many people in here that can do it better and save you the headaches.  My truck got totaled this week.  But all I had to do was place one call to Chris Curran and he is taking care of everything.

Joe Zingale - I don't stay focused very well.  I have tried so many business ventures.  None of them worked.  I learned that you should stick with what you are good at.  Especially if you have a niche and a market.  Otherwise, you end up going backwards.

Mark Dreher - Having partners helps us to stay focused.  We have somebody to talk to and keep us in tune with reality.  We have stopped doing the large, time-consuming projects so we can better serve our regular clients.  A word of advice...don't ever design your own company program.  You will be so focused on it that you won't notice your business going down the tube.


Show & Tell

You've seen his spine (yes he has one!). You've seen his arm and leg. Keith Miller needed something fresh and new to discuss. He decided to talk about our breakfast here at the meeting. Keith and Mike both eat the toast and eggs. They get a nice balance of carbs and protein. As for what the rest of you are eating...good luck. And what about the drinks? Orange juice seems healthy enough.  But do you know what it means when they say 90% concentrate?  It means you are having a glass of water!  But you can't go wrong with the milk...or can you?  Did you think that the 1% milk meant it only had 1% fat?  You thought wrong!  It means it is 99% fat!  If you don't want any fat drink skim.  And don't count on the milk to strengthen your bones.  It has calcium but only the kind that helps fractures...calcium carbonate.  Keith even attacked my personal favorite...the coffee.  Does it help get you up and going in the morning (especially to the restroom)?  That is because it is loaded with caffeine and that gets everything going.


Main Speaker 

Charles Hultstrand
Hultstrand and Goodale, PC

Chuck is a lawyer.  He handles mostly commercial and business litigation.  But before going into the business-side of the speech, he gave us the "sickening" background.

Chuck was born in Phoenix.  His family lived on the edge of Phoenix in a track home development at 30th Street and Indian School.  When he was 8-years-old his family moved to a farming community 40 miles south of Yuma. 

Going to high school there was great.  He got to do anything and everything he wanted.  He played all the sports and could be in any club he wanted.  In 1968 he won the Arizona spelling bee.  That was an experience.  He got to travel to Washington D.C. for the nationals.  They were having riots back then.  And Robert Kennedy had just been killed so the white house was closed. 

Chuck also had a lot of interesting jobs as a teen.  He told us one story about when he worked for a pesticide supplier.  One day he decided to get rid of the weeds around the barn.  He and chuck grabbed all sorts of weed and insecticide chemicals (all concentrated) and mixed them together.  The weeds shriveled up on impact.  His boss bragged that nothing would grow their for 50 years! 

Chuck survived the chemical concoction and moved to Phoenix to attend ASU.  He earned a degree in general business.  He got a job at a bank working in the proof department.  He worked there for the next 3-4 years while going to school.  Chuck also worked on one of the first hot shot crews.  He got to set forest fires for training crews.  He also worked in retail briefly.  He worked in a pharmacy with a "no questions asked" return policy.  He has a greater appreciation for the retailers in the group based on that experience.

After getting his law degree at UofA, Chuck headed north towards Flagstaff to escape the heat.  He had to stop in Phoenix on the way to take the bar exam.  He had to work to pay his way while here so he looked for some clerking jobs.  He called one lawyer that had just lost 4 people.  Chuck was immediately offered a job.   This was good experience for him.  He worked with two seasoned lawyers and was exposed to all areas of the law.  He even traveled to other states to work on cases.  He tried a criminal case in Texas and another in Hawaii.  He stayed with this firm 8 years.

Over the years Chuck has learned a little about everything...Arabian horses, jewelry, etc.  He learns something new with every case.  And lately he has learned a lot about covenants not to compete.

Covenants Not to Compete (CNTC)
Chuck decided to talk about CNTC because he has seen a developing trend in this area of the law.  Employees will sign the CNTC, leave and go to work for the competition.  In the past, employers would try to enforce the CNTC by getting injunctions or threatening their former employees with lawsuits.

The trend now, however, is to send a letter to the new employer and threaten to sue them for intentional interference with a contractual agreement.  They do this because (1) they don't want their employees going to work for the competition and (2) they are trying to recover damages from the loss of the employee.

This all started back in the 1970's.  It was a case involving a dental technician, just a regular hourly employee.  She left and went to work for a competitor.  The old employer tried to sue and get an injunction.  But the court ruled that you just can't stop people from making a living. 

The next case involved a pest control company.  This was a little different because they deal in "areas".  But the courts stayed by their original argument.  The employees in question were not in the managerial category.

But things have evolved.  Cases involving disk jockeys and produce managers came up.  The court of appeals decided that claims had to be reasonable in

  • Geographic scope

  • Duration of time, and

  • Against public policy.

If you sell a business and sign a CNTC, courts are more likely to enforce it.   But the same principles apply.

There was one case involving a unique business.  There were only 2 in the Valley.  The new and old owners had a falling out.  The old owner figured he could get around the CNTC by "volunteering" for the competition.  This case ended up with a jury trial where he was eventually told not to do it.  When going through covenants you must be sure to cover all of your bases.

The longest you can enforce a CNTC with a sales manager is 6 months.  The purpose is to allow the old employer time to hire, train and acquaint the replacement with the customers.  The purpose is not to stop businesses from competing. 

Many companies have a valley-wide market.  You may not be able to protect the entire area.  And you can't prohibit someone from using their skills and abilities, even if you trained them.  But like any other contracts, there is consideration.  There are ways around things.  You can make training expenses in the nature of a loan.  Or you can limit someone from doing one particular skill.

The bottom line is, it can be enforceable but it may not be.  This is one area of the law that they use the blue-pencil rule.

Chuck handed out a standard jury instruction sheet.  Unless a case needs special instructions, this is how juries are to decide cases.  This one deals with contractual relationships.

COMMERCIAL TORTS 11
Interference With Contract - Elements
Plaintiff claims that defendant improperly interfered with plaintiff's contract with _________.

To establish this claim, plaintiff must prove:

  1. Plaintiff had a contract with __________;

  2. Defendant knew about the contract;

  3. Defendant intentionally interfered with the plaintiff's contractual relationship with _______, which caused a breach or termination of that relationship;

  4. The defendant's conduct was improper; and

  5. The plaintiff suffered damage caused by the breach or termination of plaintiff's contractual relationship with ______.

COMMERCIAL TORTS 12
Interference With Contract - Damages
If you find that defendant improperly interfered with plaintiff's contract with ______, you must then decide the full amount of money that will reasonably and fairly compensate plaintiff for each of the following elements of damages proved by the evidence to have resulted from the interference with the contract:

  1. The net [profit] [benefit] the plaintiff would have received had the contract been performed;

  2. Damage to plaintiff's reputation; and

  3. Any emotional suffering sustained by plaintiff.

 

[membersonly/archives/former_members/hultstrand.htm]

 

 
Back to Top